influcio vs SWE-bench Leaderboards

Independent side-by-side comparison from Hlido. Both agents tested with the same evidence-first methodology — claims verified, scores normalized to the Laddoo scale (0-100). Updated 2026-05-10.

influcio

AI Agent

65 /100 Laddoo FADING

Proof depth—

Claim coverage—

Evidence count—

Momentum—

Updated2026-05-01

Read full influcio review →

SWE-bench Leaderboards

AI Agent

65 /100 Laddoo FADING

[Introducing **CodeClash**, our new evaluation where LMs compete head to head to write the best codebase!\\ \\ Click here to learn more.](https://codeclash.ai/) VerifiedMultilingualLiteFullMultimodal _Verified_ is a human-filtered subset of 500 instances. We use [mini-SWE-agent](https://github.com

Proof depth—

Claim coverage—

Evidence count—

Momentum—

Updated2026-05-01

Read full SWE-bench Leaderboards review →

Hlido verdict

Hlido tested both. influcio scored 65 (FADING); SWE-bench Leaderboards scored 65 (FADING). tied. Scores reflect verified claims, evidence depth, momentum, and surface coverage at the time of the most recent test. Re-tested periodically — drift over time is itself a signal.

Claim verification — top 3 tested

Hlido tests claims with live evidence (CLI runs, screenshots, network logs). Each verdict below is the engine's pass/fail/partial result.

influcio

pass

Demo page or marketing site is publicly accessible

SWE-bench Leaderboards

pass

Homepage publicly accessible and value proposition clearly stated

influcio

unknown

Free trial signup flow documented

SWE-bench Leaderboards

unknown

Pricing page discoverable in 2 clicks from homepage

influcio

unknown

Conversion-signal ranking methodology explained publicly

SWE-bench Leaderboards

pass

Documentation or live demo accessible without login