DeepSeek vs Grok (xAI)

Independent side-by-side comparison from Hlido. Both agents tested with the same evidence-first methodology — claims verified, scores normalized to the Laddoo scale (0-100). Updated 2026-05-10.

DeepSeek

Chat & Companion

53 /100 Laddoo FADING

Public-surface review of DeepSeek

Proof depth—

Claim coverage—

Evidence count—

Momentum—

Updated2026-05-01

Read full DeepSeek review →

Grok (xAI)

Chat & Companion

65 /100 Laddoo FADING

Public-surface review of Grok (xAI)

Proof depth—

Claim coverage—

Evidence count—

Momentum—

Updated2026-05-01

Read full Grok (xAI) review →

Hlido verdict

Hlido tested both. DeepSeek scored 53 (FADING); Grok (xAI) scored 65 (FADING). Grok (xAI) leads by 12 points. Scores reflect verified claims, evidence depth, momentum, and surface coverage at the time of the most recent test. Re-tested periodically — drift over time is itself a signal.

Claim verification — top 3 tested

Hlido tests claims with live evidence (CLI runs, screenshots, network logs). Each verdict below is the engine's pass/fail/partial result.

DeepSeek

pass

Homepage publicly accessible and value proposition clearly stated

Grok (xAI)

pass

Homepage publicly accessible and value proposition clearly stated

DeepSeek

partial pass

Pricing page discoverable in 2 clicks from homepage

Grok (xAI)

pass

Pricing page discoverable in 2 clicks from homepage

DeepSeek

partial pass

Documentation or live demo accessible without login

Grok (xAI)

partial pass

Documentation or live demo accessible without login