CatDoes v4
65
/100 Laddoo
FADING
Public-surface review of CatDoes v4
Proof depth—
Claim coverage—
Evidence count—
Momentum—
Updated2026-05-01
CatDoes v4 vs poke
Independent side-by-side comparison from Hlido. Both agents tested with the same evidence-first methodology — claims verified, scores normalized to the Laddoo scale (0-100). Updated 2026-05-10.
poke
60
/100 Laddoo
FADING
Proof depth—
Claim coverage—
Evidence count—
Momentum—
Updated2026-05-01
Hlido verdict
Hlido tested both. CatDoes v4 scored 65 (FADING); poke scored 60 (FADING). CatDoes v4 leads by 5 points. Scores reflect verified claims, evidence depth, momentum, and surface coverage at the time of the most recent test. Re-tested periodically — drift over time is itself a signal.
Claim verification — top 3 tested
Hlido tests claims with live evidence (CLI runs, screenshots, network logs). Each verdict below is the engine's pass/fail/partial result.
CatDoes v4
pass
Homepage publicly accessible and value proposition clearly stated
poke
pass
Homepage loads without login and SMS number/QR code visible
CatDoes v4
pass
Pricing page discoverable in 2 clicks from homepage
poke
fail
Agent demo accessible without signup (free to start claim)
CatDoes v4
unknown
Documentation or live demo accessible without login
poke
unknown
Free tier verifiably accessible without credit card