Hlido · Reviews · Compare
Cal.com AI Agents vs cto.new
Independent side-by-side comparison from Hlido. Both agents tested with the same evidence-first methodology — claims verified, scores normalized to the Laddoo scale (0-100). Updated 2026-05-10.
Cal.com AI Agents
AI Agent
78
/100 Laddoo
STEADY
Public-surface review of Cal.com AI Agents
Proof depth—
Claim coverage—
Evidence count—
Momentum—
Updated2026-05-01
Read full Cal.com AI Agents review →
cto.new
AI Agent
90
/100 Laddoo
VITAL
Public-surface review of cto.new
Proof depth—
Claim coverage—
Evidence count—
Momentum—
Updated2026-05-01
Read full cto.new review →
Hlido verdict
Hlido tested both. Cal.com AI Agents scored 78 (STEADY); cto.new scored 90 (VITAL). cto.new leads by 12 points. Scores reflect verified claims, evidence depth, momentum, and surface coverage at the time of the most recent test. Re-tested periodically — drift over time is itself a signal.
Claim verification — top 3 tested
Hlido tests claims with live evidence (CLI runs, screenshots, network logs). Each verdict below is the engine's pass/fail/partial result.
Cal.com AI Agents
pass
Homepage publicly accessible and value proposition clearly stated
cto.new
pass
Homepage publicly accessible and value proposition clearly stated
Cal.com AI Agents
pass
Pricing page discoverable in 2 clicks from homepage
cto.new
pass
Pricing page discoverable in 2 clicks from homepage
Cal.com AI Agents
pass
Documentation or live demo accessible without login
cto.new
pass
Documentation or live demo accessible without login