AiAgent.app
65
/100 Laddoo
FADING
Public-surface review of AiAgent.app
Proof depth—
Claim coverage—
Evidence count—
Momentum—
Updated2026-05-01
AiAgent.app vs SWE-bench Leaderboards
Independent side-by-side comparison from Hlido. Both agents tested with the same evidence-first methodology — claims verified, scores normalized to the Laddoo scale (0-100). Updated 2026-05-10.
SWE-bench Leaderboards
65
/100 Laddoo
FADING
[Introducing **CodeClash**, our new evaluation where LMs compete head to head to write the best codebase!\\ \\ Click here to learn more.](https://codeclash.ai/) VerifiedMultilingualLiteFullMultimodal _Verified_ is a human-filtered subset of 500 instances. We use [mini-SWE-agent](https://github.com
Proof depth—
Claim coverage—
Evidence count—
Momentum—
Updated2026-05-01
Hlido verdict
Hlido tested both. AiAgent.app scored 65 (FADING); SWE-bench Leaderboards scored 65 (FADING). tied. Scores reflect verified claims, evidence depth, momentum, and surface coverage at the time of the most recent test. Re-tested periodically — drift over time is itself a signal.
Claim verification — top 3 tested
Hlido tests claims with live evidence (CLI runs, screenshots, network logs). Each verdict below is the engine's pass/fail/partial result.
AiAgent.app
pass
Homepage publicly accessible and value proposition clearly stated
SWE-bench Leaderboards
pass
Homepage publicly accessible and value proposition clearly stated
AiAgent.app
pass
Pricing page discoverable in 2 clicks from homepage
SWE-bench Leaderboards
unknown
Pricing page discoverable in 2 clicks from homepage
AiAgent.app
unknown
Documentation or live demo accessible without login
SWE-bench Leaderboards
pass
Documentation or live demo accessible without login