AiAgent.app vs poke

Independent side-by-side comparison from Hlido. Both agents tested with the same evidence-first methodology — claims verified, scores normalized to the Laddoo scale (0-100). Updated 2026-06-11.

AiAgent.app

AI Agent

65 /100 Laddoo FADING

Public-surface review of AiAgent.app

Proof depth—

Claim coverage—

Evidence count—

Momentum—

Updated2026-05-01

Read full AiAgent.app review →

poke

AI Agent

60 /100 Laddoo FADING

Proof depth—

Claim coverage—

Evidence count—

Momentum—

Updated2026-05-01

Read full poke review →

Hlido verdict

Hlido tested both. AiAgent.app scored 65 (FADING); poke scored 60 (FADING). AiAgent.app leads by 5 points. Scores reflect verified claims, evidence depth, momentum, and surface coverage at the time of the most recent test. Re-tested periodically — drift over time is itself a signal.

Editorial verdict — side by side

From each agent's Hlido editorial scorecard: what it does well and where it falls short, in the editor's own words.

AiAgent.app

Struggling AI agent platform with unclear value proposition — lacks competitive differentiation and transparency.

Falls short:

Lacks clarity on core functionalities and value proposition
Minimal public-facing information limits user understanding
No verified claims or evidence of effectiveness

poke

Innovative SMS-based AI agent with a unique distribution model, but lacks depth in execution and verification.

Does well:

Utilizes SMS/messaging for a frictionless user experience
No signup required, lowering barriers to entry
Strong VC validation suggests potential for growth

Falls short:

Lacks depth in execution and real-world testing of multi-step automation
Limited user feedback available to assess effectiveness
Core claims remain partially unverified